On 04/27/2014 10:15 PM, Risker wrote:
WMF
staff review the applications using a specific rubric agreed upon with the
FDC, and post their results.
So what then is the supposed conflict in letting WMDE also review the
proposed WMF spending using a rubric agreed upon with the FDC and
posting their results?
You certainly can't argue that WMDE is more in a position of conflict of
interest than WMF staff when evaluating proposed WMF spending?
The end result is the same: "The FDC reviews the analysis, asks
additional questions, notes the responses to questions directed at the
[applicant], and makes their decision".
-- Marc