Greetings and salutations.
I am also excited and inspired by the release of the Human Rights Policy and on the
occasion of Human Rights Day, wanted to contribute to this intriguing conversation.
Addressing the conflicts between the different policy instruments and their constitutive
provisions, international human rights law and advocacy is a constant exercise in the
balancing of rights, liberties, and other protections. I think isolating the right to a
'just and favorable remuneration clause’ from Article 23 itself and the Declaration of
Human Rights as a whole is misleading, at the very least confusing. (See
http://www.claiminghumanrights.org/work_definition.html
<http://www.claiminghumanrights.org/work_definition.html> for more context). For a
discussion faithful to the protection of human rights as an objective, and as a North Star
- the issues related to volunteer work need to also incorporate the distinctions within
the international human rights regime generally and policy instruments identified
specifically.
The fundamental values of the right to work protections are primarily about discrimination
amongst workers, and the support for societal protections of public benefits explicitly
directed at state actors in relationship to citizens. The public policy issues
specifically contemplated for work without pay is focused on forced labor, underaged
labor, and as also mentioned in this thread - about the rights to collective bargaining.
Distinctions regarding work towards public goods vs. private goods, modalities of
motivation and reputation economies, household labor and volunteer expectations of paid
employees are some starting points for thinking this through. An interpretation of the
remuneration clause however requiring pay for all productive labor is not only untenable,
but also in conflict with the recognition of various UN bodies of the importance and
necessity of volunteer work to the progress towards sustainable development goals.
I do not intend to dismiss the admittedly complex considerations of open knowledge/open
source economics was they relate to human rights. Not being a regular contributor to these
discussions, I chime in because I agree that these questions shouldn’t be ignored. The
foundational contribution in the issuance of Wikimedia's Human Rights Policy in fact
enables the serious consideration of how these tensions play out in context, rather than
minimizing them.
There are likely other places one might start, but it seems to me that the International
Labor Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Right to Work
(
https://www.ilo.org/declaration/lang--en/index.htm
<https://www.ilo.org/declaration/lang--en/index.htm>), identified as one of the core
instruments in the Human Rights Policy, seem most promising. The related ILO
"Resolution concerning statistics of work, employment, and labor underutilization”
(
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/nor…
<https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_230304.pdf>)
(Oct., 2013) is instructive in parsing out the above referenced distinctions. The ILO
Volunteer Work Measurement Guide
(
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/pub…
<https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_789950.pdf>)
(May, 2021) further guides how to operationalize these principles. The UN Handbook on
Non-Profit Institutions in the System of National Accounts
(
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesf/seriesf_91e.pdf
<https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesf/seriesf_91e.pdf>) is also helping
in getting to greater clarity and deliberative consensus.
Congratulations again to the Wikimedia communities for this important public step and
commitment to global leadership on respect for human rights.
Thanks,
Eddan
On Dec 9, 2021, at 8:06 PM, Bodhisattwa Mandal
<bodhisattwa.rgkmc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I find a human rights policy based on major human rights documents of the world very
conflicting and equally amusing in an organization which grows itself in an inherently
exploitative system feeding on volunteer works. While volunteers from around the world,
who generate contents and technologies every day, build partnerships to gather more human
knowledge, man different committees to make important decisions for the movement and so on
and without whom the Wikimedia movement would not exist at all, are not remunerated in any
way, forget ensuring minimum wage for their time and effort or social protection, medical
care etc. and the organization which collects weath based on these people's works talk
about Universal Declaration of Human Rights whose Articles 23 and 25 say about right to
just and favorable remuneration, social protection, equal pay for equal work etc. I would
be very interested to see if this policy, mentioned as North Star, can guide the movement
addressing the conflicting and complicated issue w.r.t. human rights in the future.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 20:55 Richard Gaines <rgaines(a)wikimedia.org
<mailto:rgaines@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation’s Global Advocacy team is excited to announce the approval of
the Human Rights Policy
<https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Policy#Frequently_Asked_Questions>
by the Board of Trustees on 8 December 2021. Please read our blog post
<https://diff.wikimedia.org/2021/12/09/what-the-wikimedia-foundations-new-human-rights-policy-means-for-our-movement/>
about the policy and what it means for the Wikimedia Foundation’s work in the coming years
on Diff. We invite you to join representatives of the Foundation’s Global Advocacy and
Human Rights teams here <http://meet.google.com/wio-vdkw-phd> for a conversation
hour tomorrow, 10 December, at 10:00 AM ET (15:00 UTC) to address any immediate concerns,
questions, or suggestions regarding this policy or how it will be implemented. The session
will be recorded for later viewing and you may submit questions by email to myself
(rgaines(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:rgaines@wikimedia.org>) and Ziski Putz
(zputz(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:zputz@wikimedia.org>) ahead of or following the
conversation hour. Additional conversation hours on this policy will be made available in
the coming weeks.
Best regards,
--
Ricky Gaines (he/him/his)
Senior Manager, Advocacy Audiences
Wikimedia Foundation
rgaines(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:rgaines@wikimedia.org>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines> and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l>
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/37DBZDJ2YUYBN7VARYYYUY62O53LAJ7T/>
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.o
<mailto:wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org>_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org