I just scanned an article: "Wikipedia is basically just another giant
bureaucracy",
http://www.sciencealert.com/wikipedia-is-basically-just-another-old-fashion…
and it is astonishing how bad it is.
I don't really quibble with the headline - it is a bureaucracy, but some of
the content of the article is head-scratching.
For example, how many editors do you know who have achieved the rank of
super-contributor?
Can one take an article seriously that blunders this badly?
Phil