Birgitte SB wrote:
Perhaps we would be better to post a link here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS/foundation-l-archives
With a very short english message: "Last week's
summary of foundation-l is now available. Please
translate."
...
I don't like just posting "sensitive"
messages because
it is hard to tell what any one wiki will find
sensitive. Not all wiki's are complaining about the
sitenotice. Although the LSS is not perfect I think
it is the best option for "pushing" information.
The Foundation list summary looks good.
The success of a communications strategy depends not only on the
information being posted, but on people taking the time and
responsibility to read it. One of the reasons for this reading failure
is the sheer volume of messages that are issued. So, at least rating
the significance of the messages would be important. A Board statement
about a newly adopted policy would have a very high rating. Yet another
person's complaint about being blocked would have a very low one.
Putting numerical ratings on each message would help those with limited
time to choose which ones to read first.
If the information has been there and easily accessible for a reasonable
time there is no valid excuse for not being informed.
Ec