On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, at 09:47, svetlana wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, at 23:35, David Gerard wrote:
On 14 August 2014 13:56, David Cuenca
<dacuetu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It would be more sensible to let contributors
participate in the tech
roadmap in more formal and empowered way than now, because without that
early participation there is no possibility for later consensus.
A pattern we see over and over is that the developers talk at length
about what they're working on in several venues, then it's released
and people claiming to speak for the community claim they were not
adequately consulted. Pretty much no matter what steps were taken to
do so, and what new steps are taken to do so. Because there's always
someone who claims their own lack of interest is someone else's fault.
- d.
How could presence of interest help people to fix media viewer?
From its early beta testing, I wrote numerous feedback about how going fullscreen is a
misleading redundant step.
confusing wording; i mean: they still coded it to go fullscreen nomatter what
i wanted them to have a dialog of sorts instead
It was not implemented.
What more interest could I have?
It's not like I care about this too much, but I'm curious as to what you expect
me to be able to do to display my "interest".
svetlana