On Jun 17, 2014 3:55 AM, "Kevin Godfrey" <kevin.darklight(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2014, at 4:17 am, edward <edward(a)logicmuseum.com> wrote:
>
>> On 16/06/2014 21:07, Newyorkbrad wrote:
>> In its decision, the Sixth Circuit takes a broad view of Section 230
and
>> holds that Section 230 protection is not lost
even where the website
>> operator solicited contributors to post unsourced and uncorroborated
"dirt"
about anyone they pleased, and even where the website
operator selected
which contributions would be published.
Isn't that rather a bad thing? What
was the rationale behind its view?
Would this allow the WMF to exercise a degree of editorial control over
the
projects without jeopardizing their S230 immunity? I'm specifically
thinking of BLPs.
Kevin
Don't they already do that? I see office actions on rare occasions.
--Martijn
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>