On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have taken a moment to find a relevant reference to back up my
memory, see [1] which shows Salvio giuliano vigorously defending his
use of the word "butthurt". Salvio giulano is a current English
Wikipedia Arbcom member. I have not bothered to research further use
of this word by other current or past Arbcom members.
I think most readers of this list will find it odd to see that
"butthurt" used in a mild and colourful context on this list by
Russavia, gets highlighted and becomes a matter of objection by
Newyorkbrad, a current Arbcom member, resulting in Russavia being
moderated for an unspecified duration, while another Arbcom member has
previously stated that his use of the same rude word is perfectly
appropriate and legitimate public behaviour for himself in the rough
and tumble of frank discussion.
Could the rationale for moderation be restated please, so that
Russavia better understands what was unacceptable about his post here,
and could we please have an idea as to what duration moderation is
expected?
Links
1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/…
PS I have not discussed this email with Russavia, nor has Russavia
canvassed me about it.
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
This is the same discussion where you described using the word butthurt as
offensive in any context, inflammatory, uncivil, disrespectful and possibly
defamatory? What, again, was your complaint with Russavia being moderated
for writing it?