I was thinking particularly of ... Wikifamily
(Rodovid),
In fact it's implemented already though development is going on (as
never ending process).
I would say that there is great synergy (between Rodovid and
Wikipedia) opportunity as there is a lot of genealogy information to
be described for Wikipedia.
As of
... if they
still need support of any kind, but their proposals for Wikimedia
hosting remain.
I don't know (and never new) the team that is not in need of help.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Samuel Klein<meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Erik
Moeller<erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
2009/7/31 Samuel Klein
<meta.sj(a)gmail.com>om>:
On critical complex topics, the Foundation could
benefit from more
discussion and better planning. Why have we made it so hard to start
new Projects?
I would suggest that we use the strategy call for proposals to
re-surface some of the most important project ideas that people would
like to bring attention to.
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Call_for_Proposals
Yes.
IMO there's simply a lack of community
support for a lot of ideas,
either because people feel they are bad ideas, out of scope for our
mission, already covered within the scope of existing projects, or
hard to make work with the existing software. That said, I think there
I was thinking particularly of Wikikids and Wikifamily (Rodovid),
which are useful for significant audiences, implementable in an
elegant way, about creating and sharing collections of free knowledge,
and have existing multilingual communities. I don't know if they
still need support of any kind, but their proposals for Wikimedia
hosting remain.
are definitely many ideas that are worth
exploring further.
My personal favorites:
* a shared repository for structured data, the equivalent to Wikimedia
Commons for data (some coherent synthesis of ideas from FreeBase,
OmegaWiki, and Semantic MediaWiki);
* a wiki for the global community of makers to share designs and
prototypes for both functional and entertaining objects, which is
becoming increasingly important as fabbing facilities become
commonplace;
* a wiki for annotated source code examples, similar to
LiteratePrograms.org;
+1
* a wiki for standardization;
* a dedicated public outreach / evangelism wiki.
What would this look like?
Also...
*A wiki for book metadata, with an entry for every published work,
statistics about its use and siblings, and discussion about its
usefulness as a citation (a collaboration with OpenLibrary, merging
WikiCite ideas)
Sj
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l