March 10, 2009 *EMERGENCY MESSAGE*
9:30 AM
Dear Foundation Program:
As of this date, March 10, 2009 PLEASE DO NOT send to my email address any more of your messages.
Sincerely
Ron Studebaker
________________________________
From: "foundation-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org" <foundation-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 7:00:06 PM
Subject: foundation-l Digest, Vol 61, Issue 14
Send foundation-l mailing list submissions to
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
foundation-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
foundation-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of foundation-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: mo.wikipedia is not yet renamed to mo-cyrill as it was
promised ! (Brion Vibber)
2. Re: mo.wikipedia is not yet renamed to mo-cyrill as it was
promised ! (Marcus Buck)
3. Wikimania 2009 Scholarships (Mark (Markie))
4. South Korean Government's regulations on real name for
Internet (RYU Cheol)
5. Re: South Korean Government's regulations on real name for
Internet (teun spaans)
6. Re: South Korean Government's regulations on real name for
Internet (RYU Cheol)
7. Re: South Korean Government's regulations on real name for
Internet (Michael Snow)
8. Re: South Korean Government's regulations on real name for
Internet (RYU Cheol)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:10:37 -0700
From: Brion Vibber <brion(a)wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] mo.wikipedia is not yet renamed to
mo-cyrill as it was promised !
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <49DD04BD.8080801(a)wikimedia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 4/6/09 3:28 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Cetateanu Moldovanu
> <cetateanumd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> * you have promised that subdomain name mo will become mo-cyrl, it's april
>> now and mo is still not yet renamed.*
>
> None of the wikis have been moved yet, it's not that this situation is
> specific to mowiki.
No idea why this was sent to foundation-l since I already answered
directly...
Wikis have not been renamed yet since we have no infrastructure for
doing it. The requests are in the system and will be reached when we
have an opportunity to set up a renaming infrastructure -- none of the
renames are high priority, and there are plenty of things most members
of this list would rather see us do first. :)
-- brion
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:13:52 +0200
From: Marcus Buck <me(a)marcusbuck.org>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] mo.wikipedia is not yet renamed to
mo-cyrill as it was promised !
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <49DD1390.4030204(a)marcusbuck.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Brion Vibber hett schreven:
> and there are plenty of things most members
> of this list would rather see us do first. :)
>
Great to hear you are working on world peace...
As the developments on 'things most members of this list would like to
see' are rather slow, I'd say, you should urgently hire some more
people, who help you do the tasks that need to be done, or alternatively
make access to administrative tools easier, so that voluntary helpers
can help you do the tasks that need to be done.
Marcus Buck
User:Slomox
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:53:53 +0100
From: "Mark (Markie)" <newsmarkie(a)googlemail.com>
Subject: [Foundation-l] Wikimania 2009 Scholarships
To: wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
<a6424d870904081553o700efa12gfd8dbcb5a9045c9e(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Wikimania 2009 [1], this year's global event devoted to Wikimedia [2]
projects around the globe, is now accepting *applications for
scholarships*to the conference. This year's conference will be handled
from August 26-28
in Buenos Aires [3], Argentina [4]. The scholarship can be used to help
offset the costs of travel and registration. For more information, check the
official information page [5]. Please remember that the Call for
Participation [6] is still open, please submit your papers! Without
submissions, Wikimania would not be nearly as fun!
[1] http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/wiki/Portal
[2] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buenos_Aires
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina
[5] http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships
[6] http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/wiki/Call_for_Participation
Regards
Mark
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:53:01 +0900
From: RYU Cheol <rcheol(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [Foundation-l] South Korean Government's regulations on real
name for Internet
To: foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
<ee53297c0904082153q3e4be3f6o4a16beb20baee50(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
According to this post,
http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-korea-youtube-korea-to-begi…
,
"Google, the world?s largest Internet company, has finally submitted
to South Korea?s unprecedented Internet regulations, including
agreeing to implement a ?real name? system in which any South Korean
can post their contents only after they confirm their resident
registration number."
Wikipedia have to response to this regulation.
Any site which has more than 100,000 visitors for a day have to
implement real name system according to the regulation.
We have to check the number of visitors from South Korea. If we have
more than that, we have to decide if we will allow editing or not from
South Korea.
It's a serious challenge for Wikipedia.
-Cheol
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:35:12 +0200
From: teun spaans <teun.spaans(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] South Korean Government's regulations on
real name for Internet
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<8fb899d70904082235k2850397cie19e195284e89702(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
"oncurrently April 1 is when the amendment to South Korea?s Act on the
Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and User
Protection will go into effect".
That date smells ;-)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:53 AM, RYU Cheol <rcheol(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> According to this post,
>
> http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-korea-youtube-korea-to-begi…
> ,
>
> "Google, the world?s largest Internet company, has finally submitted
> to South Korea?s unprecedented Internet regulations, including
> agreeing to implement a ?real name? system in which any South Korean
> can post their contents only after they confirm their resident
> registration number."
>
> Wikipedia have to response to this regulation.
>
> Any site which has more than 100,000 visitors for a day have to
> implement real name system according to the regulation.
> We have to check the number of visitors from South Korea. If we have
> more than that, we have to decide if we will allow editing or not from
> South Korea.
>
> It's a serious challenge for Wikipedia.
>
> -Cheol
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:42:06 +0900
From: RYU Cheol <rcheol(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] South Korean Government's regulations on
real name for Internet
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<ee53297c0904082242i68b4b64fw8775f799a16b4505(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Yap, it's silly. But it's happening in Korea.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/04/123_42862.html
2009/4/9 teun spaans <teun.spaans(a)gmail.com>:
> "oncurrently April 1 is when the amendment to South Korea?s Act on the
> Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and User
> Protection will go into effect".
> That date smells ;-)
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:53 AM, RYU Cheol <rcheol(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to this post,
>>
>> http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-korea-youtube-korea-to-begi…
>> ,
>>
>> "Google, the world?s largest Internet company, has finally submitted
>> to South Korea?s unprecedented Internet regulations, including
>> agreeing to implement a ?real name? system in which any South Korean
>> can post their contents only after they confirm their resident
>> registration number."
>>
>> Wikipedia have to response to this regulation.
>>
>> Any site which has more than 100,000 visitors for a day have to
>> implement real name system according to the regulation.
>> We have to check the number of visitors from South Korea. If we have
>> more than that, we have to decide if we will allow editing or not from
>> South Korea.
>>
>> It's a serious challenge for Wikipedia.
>>
>> -Cheol
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:04:57 -0700
From: Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] South Korean Government's regulations on
real name for Internet
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <49DD9009.4030903(a)verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
RYU Cheol wrote:
> Yap, it's silly. But it's happening in Korea.
>
> http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/04/123_42862.html
>
However, this story indicates that contrary to the earlier report,
Google (specifically YouTube) is *not* implementing such a system. I
don't know their reasons or what legal analysis was involved, and I
hesitate to base my understanding of this law on translated news
reports. But I can't imagine why we would try to block South Koreans
from contributing, whether or not they comply with the requirements
described.
--Michael Snow
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:19:41 +0900
From: RYU Cheol <rcheol(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] South Korean Government's regulations on
real name for Internet
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<ee53297c0904082319s704c6b13lc0c2249d197c500e(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Until today they were considering to implement, but finally they
decided to abandon the business in South Korea. Nobody who set his
profile to South Korea cannot upload video and cannot comments on
Youtube. Now you got it?
-Cheol
2009/4/9 Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)verizon.net>:
> RYU Cheol wrote:
>> Yap, it's silly. But it's happening in Korea.
>>
>> http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/04/123_42862.html
>>
> However, this story indicates that contrary to the earlier report,
> Google (specifically YouTube) is *not* implementing such a system. I
> don't know their reasons or what legal analysis was involved, and I
> hesitate to base my understanding of this law on translated news
> reports. But I can't imagine why we would try to block South Koreans
> from contributing, whether or not they comply with the requirements
> described.
>
> --Michael Snow
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
End of foundation-l Digest, Vol 61, Issue 14
********************************************
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Jaska Zedlik <jz53zc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Jaska Zedlik <jz53zc(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Compulsory policies for all Wikipedias
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 2:25 PM
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 21:27, Milos
> Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The question was about a list which should exist
> somewhere (at Meta).
> >
>
> Thank you, but not obligatory a list. I meant any form,
> even a number
> of rules written on this mailing list. Otherwise we (may)
> have a
> situation when, for instance, a user puts some inflammatory
> or
> divisive content on their user page and administrators are
> unable to
> delete it, until a policy which regulates this is adopted
> locally.
> NPOV and Wikimedia Founding principles regulate only
> "articles and
> other encyclopedic content" and can't be applied in this
> case.
>
> Or even further, community could adopt a policy when
> divisive content
> is allowed on user pages. NPOV is not violated, Founding
> principles
> are not violated as well. So everything depends only on a
> local
> community. I don't think this is a common thing, but maybe
> it worth
> thinking about this now rather when we face this problem.
>
Those are not situations which would be covered by any Compulsory policy across projects. Community governance does depend only on the local community. That is a feature not a bug.
Birgitte SB
Hello all,
A reminder that WikiSym 2009 will be in Orlando, Florida, from October
25-27. The deadline for submitting papers, workshops and panel
proposals is March 27; April 24th is the deadline for posters,
demonstrations and WikiFest (practical experience) proposals.
Topics of interest include:
* social software for collaboration and work group processes
* wiki user experiences, usability, and discourse analysis
* reputation systems, quality assurance processes
* scalability---social and technical
* wiki technologies and implementations
* translation and multilingual wiki content
* educational applications
* wiki for non-textual media (images, video, audio)
* content dynamics and wiki evolution
* wiki journalism
* wiki archiving and versioning
* wiki administration: dealing with abuse and resolving conflict
* wiki and the semantic web, knowledge management, tacit knowledge
* wiki for small audiences (departmental and family wikis)
* legal issues (copyright, licensing)
* visualization of wiki structure
* wiki fiction
For more information, see the Call for Papers:
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2009/tiki-index.php?page=Call+for+Papers
WikiSym is an annual conference devoted to research into all aspects
of wikis, including wiki communities, wiki software and technology,
and using wikis in education and organizations. Research papers about
the Wikimedia projects are welcome! Papers are peer reviewed and
archived in the ACM digital library (see past proceedings:
http://portal.acm.org/toc.cfm?id=SERIES11299&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&type=series&id…
The conference is colocated with OOPSLA 2009. For more, see:
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2009/
-- Phoebe Ayers (2009 Wikimedia Liason)
Hello all,
I think that when such a number of people come together it would be nice to
have a key-signing in Berlin. If you have no idea, what a key-signing is, look
at the wikipedia-article [[en:Key_signing_party]].
If you don't own a pgp-key yet and are an linux-user there are several how-tos
on the net to get one fast (there are how-tos for windows-users too, but it's
more complex, but that doesn't need to stop you).
Because there is no time (and place) for a hash-methode-keysigning (you know,
all standing in a line for hours ;)), I would organise a
list-methode-keysigning. That means that you send me
*Your nick (if you have one)
*Your realname (optional, but some people don't sign non-realname-keys)
*Your keynumber
*Your key-hash
*Your key (if it is not on normal key-servers)
to pgp(a)daniel.baur4.info.
I will make a list of that data. Then I (respectively the verein) will print
out several copies of that list and place them at central places (like the
reception or the c-base) for hand-out. You can also place sticker on your
nameplate (to let people easier find you) if you like (I have colorful
sticker-dots here ;)).
You will take such an list and start looking for other people, that stand on
the list, check your hash on his/her list and his/her hash on your list and
mark your name as checked on his/her list and his/her name on your list if
all is right. Then continue until all entries on your list are checked (or
the meeting is over).
It would be very nice if many people would participate to increase the level
of trust (at least the key-trust) between us.
Follow up to foundation-list.
Sincerly,
DaB.
P.S: Even if you come just to the party on saturday, you can take part!
2.P.S: I organize a key-signing for the first time, so please be patient if I
did anything wrong.
--
Diese eMail sollte mit dem PGP-Schlüssel 0x2D3EE2D42B255885 digital signiert
sein. Bitte beachten Sie, das unsignierte eMails beliebig gefälscht sein
können. Achten Sie daher auf Signaturen.
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:09 AM
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM,
> GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > This is of sufficient merit that I do it this way.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > Aan u verzonden door GerardM via Google Reader: Court:
> Congress can't
> > put public domain back into copyright via Ars Technica
> door
> > nate(a)arstechnica.com
> (Nate Anderson) op 6-4-09
> > In 1994, Congress jammed a batch of foreign books and
> movies back into
> > the copyright closet. They had previously fallen into
> the public domain
> > for a variety of technical reasons (the author hadn't
> renewed the
> > rights with the US Copyright Office, the authors of
> older works hadn't
> > included a copyright notice, etc.) and companies and
> individuals had
> > already started reusing the newly public works. Did
> Congress have the
> > right to put a stop to this activity by shoving the
> works back into
> > copyright? On Friday, a federal court said no.
> > "Traditional contours of copyright"
> > 1994's Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) brought US
> intellectual
> > property law in line with that of other countries.
> Section 514 of URAA
> > better aligned US copyright law with the international
> Berne
> > Convention, one of the earliest international
> intellectual property
> > treaties. Though Berne had first been signed back in
> 1886, the US
> > hadn't joined up until a century later, in 1988.
> > Click here to read the rest of this article
> >
> >
> > Dingen die u vanaf hier kunt doen:
> > - Abonneren op Ars Technica met Google Reader
> > - Aan de slag met Google Reader om eenvoudig al uw
> favoriete sites bij
> > te houden
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> The URL, for those wanting the rest of the story:
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/court-congress-cant-put-pub…
>
While this is definitely encouraging news, we might want to hold off on changing our evaluation of URAA restorations. The tenth circuit doesn't include Florida. I don't know exactly what the next level of appeals would be, but we might want to wait for a ruling that covers WMF servers before we act on it. I hope these restorations continue to be struck down in the courts. It will be much simpler to determine copyright if they go away.
Birgitte SB
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> From: Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 12:39 PM
> 2009/4/6 Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com>:
>
>
> > While this is definitely encouraging news, we might
> want to hold off on changing our evaluation of
> > URAA restorations. The tenth circuit doesn't include
> Florida. I don't know exactly what the next
> > level of appeals would be, but we might want to wait
> for a ruling that covers WMF servers before
> > we act on it. I hope these restorations continue to
> be struck down in the courts. It will be much
> > simpler to determine copyright if they go away.
>
> Somewhat tangentially, do we still need to worry about
> Florida? I was
> under the impression we'd moved wholesale, servers and all,
> to
> California, so we were in the ninth circuit
> jurisdiction...
>
> --
I remember once asking about this during the move. At the time I was concerned about the weird and unpalatable 9th Circuit Ruling in Twin Books v. Walt Disney [1]. The response was that the servers were remaining in Florida. Please someone correct if I am mistaken.
Birgitte SB
[1] http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2006/12/bambis-twin-copyright-horrors.html
>From the feedback regarding Wikibooks' last meeting, it was
generally felt to be worthwhile, so I'd like to have another
meeting on Thursday April 9 at 21:00UTC. That's 5PM in
Philidelphia, for example.
Once again, I've started a section on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks/Community-building for
this session with 2 topics to discuss: changing FlaggedRevs
configuration and coordinating feedback about Collections.
Hopefully people will be able to make it, especially those who
couldn't last time. We'll be meeting in #wikibooks on
irc.freenode.net as usual. Anyone who's interested can come -
listen, participate, whatever!
See you there
-Mike
----
Mike.lifeguard
mikelifeguard(a)fastmail.fm
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:09 AM
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM,
> GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > This is of sufficient merit that I do it this way.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > Aan u verzonden door GerardM via Google Reader: Court:
> Congress can't
> > put public domain back into copyright via Ars Technica
> door
> > nate(a)arstechnica.com
> (Nate Anderson) op 6-4-09
> > In 1994, Congress jammed a batch of foreign books and
> movies back into
> > the copyright closet. They had previously fallen into
> the public domain
> > for a variety of technical reasons (the author hadn't
> renewed the
> > rights with the US Copyright Office, the authors of
> older works hadn't
> > included a copyright notice, etc.) and companies and
> individuals had
> > already started reusing the newly public works. Did
> Congress have the
> > right to put a stop to this activity by shoving the
> works back into
> > copyright? On Friday, a federal court said no.
> > "Traditional contours of copyright"
> > 1994's Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) brought US
> intellectual
> > property law in line with that of other countries.
> Section 514 of URAA
> > better aligned US copyright law with the international
> Berne
> > Convention, one of the earliest international
> intellectual property
> > treaties. Though Berne had first been signed back in
> 1886, the US
> > hadn't joined up until a century later, in 1988.
> > Click here to read the rest of this article
> >
> >
> > Dingen die u vanaf hier kunt doen:
> > - Abonneren op Ars Technica met Google Reader
> > - Aan de slag met Google Reader om eenvoudig al uw
> favoriete sites bij
> > te houden
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> The URL, for those wanting the rest of the story:
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/court-congress-cant-put-pub…
>
While this is definitely encouraging news, we might want to hold off on changing our evaluation of URAA restorations. The tenth circuit doesn't include Florida. I don't know exactly what the next level of appeals would be, but we might want to wait for a ruling that covers WMF servers before we act on it. I hope these restorations continue to be struck down in the courts. It will be much simpler to determine copyright if they go away.
Birgitte SB