On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Pratik Lahoti wrote:
Of course it can be done. No big deal.
But along with getting new editors, the article needs to be improved as well. Both are
equally important and necessary in my opinion.
Absolutely, Pratik. My point is that the most critical aspect of an initiative such as
this should be to get as many community members involved as possible. Once this happens,
and unfortunately only when it happens, will it gather momentum and be sustainable - and
then sub-groups of editors will then drift onto other things (more COTMs or different
collaborative initiatives entirely.) ...which is exactly the way it should be. The
essential thing is to keep the number of folks involved growing. As this happens, the
community will do what the community does best : improve articles! ...so not
contradicting you; just making a point of emphasis about this effort - especially at the
current stage of its lifecylce. Keep up the fantastic work, buddy. Awesome to see you
going!
hisham