On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org> wrote:
My idea of making the number of jury members in a
particular round infinite,
was that we could hand out a jury token to each community member easily, and
let them process 100-1000 images. If enough people do that, and if the
distribution is either random or based on the pictures that have the least
votes, that should give a somewhat (not perfect) workflow.
Hope that makes sense,
Lodewijk
I stand on my point that it would be hard. :-)
Not really in the tool supporting so many "juries", which would be
simple, but in processing that.
You could easily augment the data points by storing which images where
viewed by a single user and if it was +1, -1, or skipped. We could
also assume that all members are honest wikimedians and nobody is
trying to game to contest.
You end up with a pool of images ranked (eg. 1-10) by 1,000 different users.
How do you get the top-10/100/500 images?
The image some gave 10 points to, would barely have received 5 by
others, and viceversa...