What the previous years was done in NL is that each jurymember made his own
(small) set, that then the jury decided on.
What lodewijk describes seems to be a voting engine, but I think a selection
engine is nice as well. What I see for that:
- each jury member has his own list (starting out the same)
- you can drop pictures a level or take them to the next level
- after having done a first level, you can inspect the pictures in the next
level to do the same till you have a small enough selection.
- history per jury member, you don't want him to do it all at one go :-)
- configurable settings regarding size of the pictures/number of pictures
per page, easy changable on the fly. I can imagine the jury member to
select on thumbnails in the first level, and eventually looking at full
screen pictures at the end.
As far as I remember something like that has been proposed before, I thing
a process like that can work as well. After that, the different selections
should be combined deduplicated, and then a voting session might be held,
or a selection process again in a joint session of the jury.
Does this make sense?
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Lodewijk wrote:
Hi Katie,
I'm particularly referring to the national processes here. I saw someone
mention that India might get 100.000 images... (worst case?) and that got
me thinking ;) Every country will have a slightly different process.
I think it is a nice approach to have people rate. If we can just then add
access options (access for all, or for a specified group). I don't have a
clou if WP is the best option. But bear in mind the interface should be
able to hold up to 100.000 images. Ideally:
* It would allow organizers to simply insert a list of commons file names
for the photos
* It would allow organizers to specify who should have access to the voting
interface
* It would allow organizers to have an overview of who voted, how often
* it would allow the user to show X images on a page, on a specified size
and rank each of them
* It would allow the user to sort based on name, date, number of rankings
and current ranking
* It would include a simple option (clicking) to enlarge the picture, and
include a link to the detail page on commons.
Does that make sense?
Lodewijk
2012/6/21 aude <aude.wiki(a)gmail.com>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lodewijk
<lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org>wrote;wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is there anyone who would be willing to help set up a jury process tool
>> that can be used in multiple countries? I'm looking for a software tool
>> that makes juring more easy than going through commons categories. Would be
>> happy to brainstorm if someone is willing to work it out.
>>
>
> We have a technical volunteer "intern" helping us in DC and this is
> something he wants to work on.
>
> I'm not exactly sure how the process worked last year, but we're thinking
> either integrating something into the WordPress site so that people can
> browse photos (pulled from Commons, like InstantCommons) and rate them. A
> public voting phase could help narrow the selection for the jury, which
> could also make use of the tool.
>
> Thoughts? suggestions? brilliant ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Lodewijk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>>
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia
>
http://wikimediadc.org
> @wikimediadc / @wikimania2012
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu