Content and participation in Wikipedia is already in decline. This would
hasten the process.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Wilhelm Schnotz <wilhelm(a)nixeagle.org>wrote;wrote:
I would assume such a system would just create a
"non-published"
namespace that articles would sit in... And software changes could be
made to change red links that point to where the article should be in
main space a different color and point them at the "non-published"
space.
In short readers, users etc could all see them, jush google would not
index them. The benefit of the system as stated is users and readers
would know by clicking on the non blue links that these articles are
still "in the works".
Such a system would work decently well if moving from one space to the
other could be done by any registered user... Sorta like moves are
done today.
Please note that I am not advocating this, but I think tossing around
alternate ideas can't hurt. This idea I think defines a decent answer
to your question, feel free to change it around or attack it all you
like, just be constructive about it.
On 1/14/09, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 wjhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
I am sorry I still do not get it.
1) Is your proposal going to completely hide "unfinished" articles from
the
public? If so who will be able to see them? Admins? Users?>>
To hide those articles which are unfinished, or which the community has
decided are unfinished. So the AfD process becomes simply the "Hide It
process" much less contentious.
You didn't answer the question about who gets to see them.
Given most possible answers to this question, it'll just end up being the
same
as AFD. After all, right now an admin can see a deleted article.
<<3) Isn't your proposal hiding all
stubs as well as some other
articles?
After all no stub by very definition is ready for "public
consumption".>>
No. It has nothing to do with stubs or non-stubs. Stubs are published
today, and they would be published tomorrow. The only thing this does
is provide a way for AfD to turn into something with less conflict.
Well, is it about hiding articles ready for public consumption, or isn't
it?
If it is, stubs get hidden. If it's not, you
shouldn't say it is.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l