--- Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Mark Richards wrote
You make it sound like 'troll-folk' are
identifiable,
and do nothing but 'troll' (whatever that
is).
You make it sound as if you have never come across
an actual troll.
Well, in fact, the only time I have felt 'trolled' was
by a Wikipedian apparently in good standing.
In
fact, this word is almost always applied to
someone
with whom we have a disagreement. It does not
apply to
them in general, usually just the thing we
disagree
with.
Like I said, the term is consistently misused. Like
I said, I see nothing
funny or interesting in blurring its actual
denotation.
I believe that this is entirely subjective. There is
nothing about its 'actual denotation' that is not
blurred.
This sort of
dehumanizing generalisation is not
helpful.
It is remarkably helpful to distinguish between
rhetorical proponents of
strongly-held views, and trolls who (as far as I can
see) actually are
dependent in a psychological sense on
confrontational argument. The
difference between needing to see that others hold
sincere opposing views,
and needing help.
Charles
On the contrary - the claim that the two can be
distinguished is entirely unhelpful. It is simply an
ad hominim attack dressed up.
Mark
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com