On 3/13/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/13/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
(now that
semi-protection exists I can't personally think of a scenario where
full protection is *ever* a good idea).
Pages being hit repeatedly by vandles useing sleeper accounts.
Surely there can't be enough sleeper accounts to keep this up for very
long. Maybe I'm wrong here, though. I always thought it was strange
that there was no minimum number of edits factored into the
semi-protection criteria.
Very high profile pages
Good point. I was thinking of articles, but I can see why you might
want to protect some administrative pages.
multi participant edit war particularly for three or
more
Wouldn't it be better to block the edit warriors?
Pages I don't want even admins to edit (election
pages and the like).
Along with high profile pages, good point.
Anthony