On 11/08/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/08/07, Josh Gordon
<user.jpgordon(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/11/07, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Also, as a banned user, I must ask you to not
imply that
banned/blocked users 'deserve' to be banned/blocked.
I'm not
familiar with the details of your case, so it is possible you are an
exception, but there aren't many.
Exception only in the sense that ABF is not banned or blocked at all; ABF
is
merely expected to adhere to the same policies as
any other editor, in
particular the prohibition against open proxies. ABF is an editor in good
good standing,
And his martyr act is starting to wear really thin.
It's not an act. This is the transparency people have been asking me
for for weeks... the answer to the question people wouldn't stop
asking. I'm sorry if you don't like the answer, but that's not my
fault. 'Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.'
Armed Blowfish