On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:02:07 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
> What, you mean Angela freely states that she was
born on X date in X
> hospital, and we have the record, and they still won't let it in?
Not quite in that level of detail (I don't think
she's identified what
hospital she was born in and I haven't registered for an account with
ancestry.co.uk to view the details it gives), but along those lines.
Ah, right. So it *is* a matter of editors joining the dots from
disjoint facts, rather than a citation to support a fact available
from another source. Not surprising it's been removed, then. Seems a
bit [[WP:STALK]]ish anyway. Who cares?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG