On 10/10/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There's plenty of articles which are festering cesspits, one or two
pathological editors
warring over them, and no-one trying (or caring) to "make it good".
The benefit of having an article to read will always outweigh the problem of
it putting a slight strain on Wikipedia. I think one can always find some
willing editor to come along and fix an article (do something to it at
least). It's just a matter of improving our mechanisms of sorting out
POV-pushers and of article improvement.
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)