On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 January 2011 16:55, Anthony
<wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
That's what he said September 18, 2004. So
no, this wasn't an honest
mistake (which still would be reason not to trust what he says). And
it wasn't even just Wales being misleading, as he so often does. This
was an intentional lie.
If he was intentionally lying, he must have had a motive. What motive
could he possibly have for lying about his age by a day?
He was definitely intentionally lying, either in 2004 and 2010, or in
2007. So there is no "if", and that means he must have had a motive.
However, I don't see the point in speculating over what that motive
was, as we don't even know for sure which of the times he was lying.
Do you think he was just doing it to be annoying?
No.
Jimmy has plenty of faults (we
all do), but being annoying for the sake of it isn't one of them in my
experience.
Not mine either. So why do you bring it up?