On 21/04/07, doc <doc.wikipedia(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
George Herbert wrote:>
Any open source project, content or code or
whatever, is subject to or
at risk of attacks. This is a fact of life.
Ah, so tough on the people who are
being adversely affected, libeled and
attacked? We tell them that it is a risk we (sorry, they?) have to run.
A fact of life 9for them)?
Well, we could give up, shut down the project, and all go and do something else.
And how does that argument help? We need to admit the real problem and
then try to find some real solutions - but unfortunately some people
would rather shoot the messenger or assume that any major change would
mean the death of wikipedia.