On Nov 27, 2007 10:38 AM, <joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
No. While that on occasion make sense, very often
additional evidence is by
itself sufficient. For example, some users have certain grammatical quirks and
spelling issues. For example I frequently write "payed" when the word is in
fact "paid". Without going into too much detail (not wanting to give banned
users too much info here) such signs when used with other evidence can be very
definitive. In such cases a sanity check from another admin might be a good
thing, but very often there's no need to email the user.
I was meaning in the case, such as this, where there is nothing
definitive tying someone to a specific banned user but one has
suspicions.
-Matt