Quoting Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>et>:
which contains the language:
"Content has been removed from this article because of a dispute over the
legality of its inclusion, and so the article may not meet normal
Wikipedia standards.
Please see the discussion on the talk page."
Raises some interesting questions. "Normal Wikipedia standards" permit
violations of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons? Do not take malice
into account? I don't think so.
Focus on that word "malice"; that is the legal black hole which will
produce serious liability.
Fred
Um, Fred, I'm confused by this statement. The actual malice standard is a
standard which is only relevant in the United States and only the standard for
public figures. William Pietri's proposed template doesn't address what
country
or standard is precisely in use. And Pietri's template doesn't even
address that
the issue is libel. So what precisely are you saying?