Phil Boswell wrote:
I appreciate
that your comment was intended humorously, but nevertheless:
half of the point of AFD, to my mind, is that it may bring an article to
the attention of someone who can improve it to the point where it doesn't
need deleting.
So you're saying that nominating an article for AFD is a cunning way to jump
the clean-up queue?
No, as I suspect you know perfectly well from the context that is not at
all what I'm saying.
I was drawing a distinction between AFD, a process which lasts for a few
days and gives ample time for an article to be improved to a point where
it's improvable, and CSD, where the article is just gone.
Does this make sense?
Cheers,
N.
--
Nicholas Boalch
School of Modern Languages & Cultures Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 3456
University of Durham Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 3421
New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK WWW:
http://nick.frejol.org/