Interesting. Just to be disruptive, I proposed OBT for Talk:Obama: People
WP:DONTLIKEIT was the only concept I got from scanning the responses. The
only point I remember; one user mentioned his watchlist; missing the point
that he could just simply add particular topic talk subpages to his
watchlist. I didn't mention there for various reasons.
-Sv
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jay Litwyn <brewhaha(a)edmc.net> wrote:
Organizing [[talk_prion]] was the first thing I did
where no rules apply.
All I did was entitle threads and answer what I could. When you are
scanning
for changes, headings help you identify the end of a thread. Once you hav
entitled the threads, you can see which threads are actually members of the
same thread. I did not get to that.
_______
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brewhaha@edmc.net
"stevertigo" <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7c402e010903121840o2a719b7cua27e899aacddfcd9@mail.gmail.com...
Certain thready discussions on certain
contentious talk pages would
benefit from less disorganized (ie. standard format) talk pages, and
more topical-based ones. I wrote up a basic concept at WP:TP (direct
shortcut WP:OBT ):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page#Organization_by_topic
仇恨郵件
最值得歡迎的
-SV
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l