On 5/14/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You appear to have gone off into entirely unconvincing
sidelines of
querulousness here. Is this still supposed to be a deletion reason?
My position is that it is imposble to write the article in a NPOV
manner useing existing sources. I have identified a POV statement
which it is unlikely that any existing sources counter. It is the
logical end point of that aproach
Now there are three ways out of this. Delete the article. Shift over
the a less exacting standard of NPOV for stubs and then apply that
standard to deletion modify (we alreadly do the former). Remove
"imposible to write a NPOV article" as a deletion reason which isnt
going to happen.
--
geni