On Nov 28, 2007 1:22 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 10:33 AM, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(Of course-- I often see it asked why we would
ever need to like to a
site like WikiTruth-- this case has shown us yet another answer, as
this valuable discussion would not have been possible with such links.
)
What specific value did the contents of that e-mail add to this discussion?
It would have been impossible to assess Durova's judgment (and lack
thereof) without actually seeing the evidence.
Who made you her judge and jury? The action has resulted in an ArbCom
case, the ArbCom is assessing it. If you want, feel free to run for
ArbCom in the current elections.
She has, supposedly,
threatened to sue the foundation for copyright violation is the email
is published on-wiki, and that is a risk the foundation does not want
to take.
Has she? I wasn't aware of that.
This necessitates the existence of linking to some
other
forum which provides the email, so the community can see her
"evidence" and judge for ourselves.
You know, I understand the impulse people have to gawk at accidents
they pass by on the highway, but it's rare that they justify their
actions as "necessity".