On 12/2/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I never particularly objected to the
article's existence and voted
"keep" each time it came up, particularly as there were quite a few
people keeping an eye on it.
So the "verifiability" problem is not so much about the article's
existence, but rather, all the unverifiable material that migrates
towards it. Wouldn't a protected two-sentence stub be the way to go?
Or, hell, even one sentence...
If you look at any other encyclopaedia, they're full of "stubs" - very
short articles that give a bare minimum of information, for less
important subjects. We should have no shame in having these.