On 4/25/07, daniwo59(a)aol.com <daniwo59(a)aol.com> wrote:
... Still, do we want to open the door to these kinds
of articles? Criticisms of
Sylvia Browne could lead to Criticisms of Uri Geller to Criticisms of George
Bush to Criticisms of Tom Cruise to Criticisms of [pick your favorite]. The
very hypothesis of the article is POV. Surely, this is not what we are here
for.
I'd really like some input. Ideally, it should be merged, but the precedent
this poses should also be mentioned.
The original article isn't that long, so they should definitely by
merged. It's bad enough having a separate criticism section in a BLP,
because they end up as POV magnets. To have a separate criticism
article is asking for trouble.
Sarah