On 2/22/06, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Ben Emmel wrote:
No, I do agree that it's not a open-and-shut
decision. But like Jimbo said,
if we still care about this article in a year, then we can argue then.
Woah, a
whole _year_? I'd thought the article was just temporarily
deleted while some details got sorted out. _Now_ I've got a serious
grounds for objection. What happens if the deleted article database gets
purged at some point before then?
If there's not enough information left on the Internet in a year to
re-create an article about him, then clearly he wasn't notable enough
for an article in the first place.
And what if there are notable
developments in the details of this topic over the course of the next
year?
If Brian Peppers goes out and assassinates the president tomorrow,
then we can re-visit the subject.
--
Mark
[[User:Carnildo]]