Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 20:17, Screamer wrote:
More to the point, the community has what we call
advisory elections,
and the founder does, for the most part, hold to them. It is not
unusual for collaborative projects to have a project leader step in from
time to time in the cooperate world, as has been my experience. This is
not always A Bad Thing.
Sure, and corporate projects also don't describe themselves with adjectives
like "community-run." Hierarchy is fine, as long as you're honest about
it.
If Jimbo is going to call Wikipedia a "community project," then he should let
it be just that. If he's going to be the ultimate dictator (benevolent and
enlightened though he may be), he should be up front about it.
Pardon the spelling, sometimes the inline corrects on its own without my
intervention. I mean to spell "corporate".
More to the point, I don't believe I have seen a history of Jim doing
things outside of the community, the times he has, I can count on my
finger. And for what it is worth, I don't see where he has denied doing so.
./scream