On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
.... Perhaps this contains the
germ of an idea: a process "Drafts for mainspace", a review debating
unuserfying. The "Bizarre Records" solution to our problems - "just what
<s>the world</s> Wikipedia needs, another <s>record label</s>
contentious process".
Either namespace, or another independent namespace ("Drafts").
User namespace makes things harder to find; which is not necessarily
appropriate. We want drafts to be communally findable - to encourage
contributions, fixes, reviews, and eventual upgrades.
This has floated before, in some variation, and not flown. But
perhaps it's time to float it again and see if it flies now.
Right. But doing things with aliases is not exactly out of reach.
And I'm somewhat surprised, considering it all, that there isn't even an
editorial guideline on moving drafts? Not that I would feel compelled to
read it, but it seems an omission.
Charles