On Nov 29, 2007 10:42 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/29/07, joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu
<joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
Being on a list does not make an arbiter so
involved as to need to recuse
themselves. If we used that level arbiters would need to recuse themselves so
frequently we'd rarely have a quorum.
The double-secrect "investigations" list seems more ambiguous.
http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wpinvestigations-l
Alec, do you think this deliberately provocative language is helpful?
Moderators, perhaps you could step in.
I know it
would radically change how I interact with the project
I see that as a positive thing.