Toby Bartels <toby+wikipedia(a)math.ucr.edu> wrote:
Anth�re wrote:
Just for the record
Since Royal We and I are not able to directly discuss
using words, I proposed that we discuss uniquely
through edition/reversion.
Everything I agree with, I keep. Everything I
don't
agree with, I revert. Words are useless, and acts will
speak by themselves. If anyone is interested in the
topic, that might be different. But as long as it is
only he and I, it is not worth and not good to spent
useless time in fruitless discussions. This is an
adaptation for our personality types. :-)
I don't think that this is a very helpful strategy.
You and RK aren't the only persons working on these pages;
it might be best if both of you stayed away for a while.
Certainly edit wars, alone, are not useful,
and there's a big difference between saying
that you're unable to discuss things with your opponent
and saying that you're no longer going to even try.
You know, Ed Poor could be a big help here.
I have been staying away from these articles on purpose for a full month. The gaia theory
(biology) really need input. I can do that. I did nothing for a full month to avoid pb
with RK. What did it changed ? Nothing. RK is going his way. And that is about it.
Why should I wait and he not ? Why should I discuss alone and get empty replies ?
Yes, please, you may call Ed to help on this. I will trust him for helping to reach a good
decision
ant
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!