David Gerard writes:
One question (and I don't mean to sound churlish):
if MNH comes back
on
2nd October and starts doing the same stuff again,
will it take
another
few months for this to be acted upon?
I think this is an important issue. While I would like the arbitration
committee to be somewhat faster, taking our time over 'first-time
offenders' at least makes sure that a considered decision is reached.
However, I do think that subsequent violations after one banning should
be rather more fast-track than that. If a user is 'violating their
probation' by doing the exact same thing they did last time -- I don't
see the complexity. I do see an appearance of toothlessness.
-Morven