If you take a look at the actual arbitration request I filed on
WP:RfAr, you'll see that I suggested that this situation be handled by
the arbitrators simply saying that they confirmed the emergency
desysopping, and that a full-fledged, formal arbitration case didn't
seem necessary under the circumstances. The arbitrators so far have
accepted this suggestion. Thus, I think we have sustained the
principle of how desysoppings are to be handled while also being
faithful to the idea of not bothering too much with process for
process's own sake.
Newyorkbrad
On 4/20/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's a
technicality, but I believe an important one. There has never
been such a thing as a 'community de-sysopping' and creating such
might be problematic.
If we were to institute such a thing, I believe it should be done with
a bit more thought and discussion.
This is the kind of thing IAR is for - so we don't have to come up
with detailed new rules to deal with situations that virtually never
happen, we can just do the obvious thing and be done with it.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l