On Nov 1, 2007 2:32 PM, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The
debate is about whether someone can arbitrarily declare someone else's
behaviour trolling, for doing something we'd previously tolerated, and
ban them indefinitely.
[snip]
I don't think this is the subject of the debate either, at least that
particular statement of it isn't very good...
When we indef. ban a user's "single purpose" sock and try to avoid
banning the primary account, we haven't banned *the user*
indefinitely.