On 5/15/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But that aside, it should still be deleted.
There's a good reason to
require a significant amount of independent sourcing. First-party
sources may be biased, promotional, inaccurate, incomplete, technically
correct but deliberately misleading, or any combination of the above.
They may be. And they may not. And by providing an alternative to
bare-faced first-party sources, we are doing the world a favour.
Steve