On 5/28/06, Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this is the general view. In particular,
don't add unsourced statements
to a fully sourced article, don't add spelling mistakes to a proofread
article etc. I would like us to formalise this.
That really should not be the case for older FAs. I rewrote two of them because I feared
they were
prime delisting candidates. Oh, and those articles didn't degrade since listing; FA
standards
simply got a lot more rigorous since they were listed.
What should happen in this case is that those articles should be
degraded to "A class" (see [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial
Team/Assessment]]). Hopefully this would cause less pain than the
current featured/non featured demotion?
Steve