Ray Saintonge wrote:
stevertigo wrote:
More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to
actually deal with
adjudicating policy and sections therein.
That can't work without opening up the broader question of how policies
are formulated and later amended. Any kind of policy review process
needs to operate separately from Arbcom, and be able to rule whether
policies were properly adopted. Until such a process is fully
operational nothing useful would be accomplished by having Arbcom rule
on those policies.
OK, here's an old-style formulation: X is to current policy and
policy-review discussions as RfAr is to the Workshop. What would X be?
It would be some sort of policy review that operated to a schematic,
with things like "in fewer than 500 words" for submissions, and so on.
And it would not be a free-for-all or brainstorming session.
Charles