On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:51:56 -0700, SJ <2.718281828(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It might be sensible to have a cleanly generalized
"Articles for
Review" page that decides what to do with articles that have trouble.
Yes. But not a bureaucratic system, hopefully, just a way of saying
"hey, this article has issues" and getting more eyes, maybe a fix, and
finally if there is an obvious consensus that the topic is silly,
remove it.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG