On 05/12/2007, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
every time you click a link it looks in both of them.
Maybe we should
be considering interwiki links to CZ? The information would still be
separate, and we could still distinguish between the models used to
create it.
Heh, that's an interesting idea.
> By the way, I'm sorry to those who have been
waiting, but I hope to
> announce our license before *too* much longer. The announcement will be
> accompanied by a very long essay, which I haven't finished yet. Please
> don't assume the license will be incompatible with
Wikipedia's...there's
> a decent chance it will be compatible.
Ony a chance? Phooey.
Larry has posted to citizendium-l saying that with the WMF/FSF/CC
announcement, that a future GFDL will be CC-by-sa compatible, that the
Citizendium licence *will not* be GFDL. (Which is IMO quite sensible,
'cos the GFDL sucks for massive-collaboration articles of a few pages,
for images, for motion pictures ...)
"Well-reasoned, polite discussion of the nature
of online knowledge
production communities, with special but not exclusive focus on
community policy (production, governance, management) questions; "the
new politics of knowledge" broadly speaking."
What, is something wrong with wikien-l??
*cough* It's an ideal to work towards.
- d.