On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:36:55 +0100, "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The origin of Schoolwatch was organised querulous
mass-AFDs of schools
for being schools. Living bios are somewhat more important.
And if AFD can't be used to solve the problem, then something else will.
Yup. You'll not find anything like the same polarisation, I think.
The Schoolwatch folks hold as an article of faith that all schools are
notable. It is far less likely that you would find any meaningful
group of editors to assert that all *people* are inherently notable.
It is self-evidently absurd. All schools will have a series of
articles in the local paper and a few inspection reports online.
Schools inclusionists choose to interpret this as multiple non-trivial
sources. The same does not apply to all people .
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG