On 5/12/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/12/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Tony Sidaway
<f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
>
> When did the board give Jimbo the power to pass CSD criteria?
The Arbitration Committee decided that he had this power.
The Arb Com doesn't have any right to make such a decision.
It is pretty hard to overule arbcom. Possible but pretty hard.
Sure, admins tend to listen to the arb com. That's very different
from saying anyone has to listen to them.
Historicaly admins are the group most likely to publicaly dissagree
with arbcom (other than those on the reciving end).
Sure, someone needs to take down illegal content.
That's not what
this is about.
In terms of other activities board involvement is generaly kept to a
minium simple because most of them don't have the time to spend the
hours each day it requires to know what is going on en.wikipedia. On
top of that the language barrier means they are going to have to
accept most wikipeidia being run without significant involvement from
them.
--
geni