On 18/12/2007, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 17 Dec 2007 at 14:33:44 +0000, "Andrew
Gray" <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> It seems to me to be inevitable that any balanced
piece over a page or
> two in length is going to link to WR (or a similar site), in much the
> same way as it's guaranteed to have a paragraph or two on Citizendium
> or Knol or whatever other competitor just got a press release issued.
Is that a "law" of Godwin's variety...
as a discussion of Wikipedia
gets longer, the probability of a link to WR being introduced
approaches one?
The introduction of a mention of it. More importantly, it's as
accurate an indicator that the thread is dead and can be ignored.
- d.