I hav seen the SpamAssasin configuration of Tera-Byte internet.
I do not remember where it is, and I could ask them again. It did not contain much in the
way of content scans, except for SMTP validity. It contained a *lot* of
Realtime-Block-List ratings a year or two ago. Open relays are a closed topic (for me) in
news:/news.admin.net-abuse.email (probably not on gmane). None are on my part of the
internet. So, for that matter, is Paul Vixie's initial declaration that he does not
want spam-friendly sites talking to him with *any* protocol. Since that time, I hav tried
to use Trend MicroSystems RBL, to no effect--too many hoops, too little feedback. I make
submissons to
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org It probably costs them fourty thousand a year to
be around.
There may indeed be thousands of proxies on the internet. Their main purpose is screening
porn from children in the way of Net Nanny, but more dynamically and reliably.
_______
No one can abuse you without your permission.
--Ann Landers
That's an empowering lie. It usually does not serve you to remember exceptions. Either
that or it pays you to make it true.
"Nathan" <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7e948df10901152056q7414db7ase6ef1e887780223e@mail.gmail.com...
With all due respect, you appear to have no idea what
you're talking about.
Nathan
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM,
brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewhaha(a)edmc.net>wrote;wrote:
Do we not yet hav a policy regarding open proxies
(relays)? I would think
that
anonymizer.com and anything like it is blocked indefinitely. hotmail
and gmail blocked
anonymizer.com. Why should we not? As a jeneral rule,
open
relays for e-mail are listed and blocked, so as a jeneral rule, mail relays
only serve congestion physics and paying users.
_______
No one can abuse you without your permission.
--Ann Landers
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l