I notice a lot of pages of countries which reply on information from the CIA
factsbook include information US diplomatic representation to that country
and that country's diplomatic representation to the US. Two things strike
me:
1. That sort of information changes very quickly, much quicker than details
about who is in government, etc, because diplomatic postings are regularly
changed. So it is something that can very very easily be out of date even
when being put on wiki, or within a small time afterwards.
2. It hardly creates a fair and balanced article if its focuses exclusively
on issues to do with that country's diplomatic relationship with the US. Is
there a single article on wiki that mentions with the British ambassador is
to a country and what the UK embassy address is? What about the Italian
Ambassador? Brazilian ambassador? Irish ambassador? Rwandan ambassador, etc.
It all adds a regrettable and unnecessary degree of americo-centrism to
articles.
Given this fact, and that the information is likely to change rapidly, is it
not time that such unnecessary and americo-centrist information was left
out? The entire world doesn't need to know who the US ambassador to Germany
is, or who the Germany ambassador to the US is, do they?
If it is thought worth keeping, it should all be moved to a specific article
on [[United States Embassies and Ambassadors]] and [[International
Ambassadors to the United States]]. There it can be easily updated and
avoids making articles appear too americocentric.
JT
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail