Yes, the existing BLP policy page is the result of many compromises,
where various more extreme proposals were reduced to something which
does, after all, have the general consent of the community. (Not that
I like all of it, perhaps nobody does, but it's been relatively stable
recently and seems to be something that we can live with.)
The proper way to change the policy there is not to try to subvert it
by persuading arb com to overturn the policy by their autonomous
action,, but discuss it widely and get actual consensus.
This should be resisted as we would resist any other attempt by a
cabal to take over Wikipedia. (I don't of course mean by defiance.
Perhaps at least the 1/3 change will be enough to affect the usually
fragile majorities there, though I hope it will not be necessary to
wait until December. One strong person can make a difference on
ArbCom. I doubt this would have happened if NYBrad had not been forced
to resign. The only serious question I have is whether we should
concentrate on this, on the sourcing adjuration board, or make it a
matter of general policy that their scope extends only to individuals
and procedure.)
On 6/19/08, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Mike R wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Charles
Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
If what the ArbCom says is fundamentally at odds
with the policy the
community wants, the ArbCom surely has to give way.
That's one opinion. Another opinion is that "ArbCom rulings do in fact
hold greater authority than that of mobs, democratic or otherwise."
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=21…
"Mob" is of course a pejorative, as are "pile-on" and other such
terms. The difference can be seen in the discussion structure.
Threaded discussions can be particularly poor at clarifying matters.
Arbitration cases are generally better at clarification than other
options, short of wiki editing done by a skilful bunch of people. Which
is why policy pages that have been worked over have the standing they
do, and it's not just a question of how many people have actually edited
them.
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG