Eh, that didn't happen, at least, not in the way you try to paint it.
Phil posted a graphic story online. Someone from Wikipedia Review
noticed it, and started a thread about it (Lir, IIRC, but it was quite
some time ago, and I don't remember exactly). Someone else, who was
probably a Wikipedia Review member (and, if I were to guess, Amorrow),
called the police about it. There seemed to have been a pretty
legitimate concern; regardless, the police thought it worth questioning.
Now, being questioned by police isn't a form of "harassment", nor is it
incredibly likely to cause problems with one's employment situation,
which is the specific point I was addressing.
David Gerard wrote:
On 21/04/07, Blu Aardvark
<jewbowales(a)wikipedia-lol.cjb.net> wrote:
As for those who are suffering other adverse
effects, I hold that much
of that is their own doing. It's unlikely that a user would face
employment problems because of their Wikipedia involvement being "outed"
unless they were a) posting libel (ie, Brian Chase) b) editing while
on-the-clock, or c) had an active conflict of interest (ie, Katefan0).
Or (d) had been actively harassed by Wikipedia Review (e.g. Phil Sandifer).
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l