On 3/13/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/13/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
(now that semi-protection exists I can't
personally think of a scenario where
full protection is *ever* a good idea).
I take it you don't agree with protecting articles that are the
subject of an edit war between established editors?
-Matt
No, I think it's better to temporarily block those established editors
for edit warring. Why block *everyone* from editing an article just
because two people can't get along? But like I said, that one's
arguable.
Because if two (or more) people have come to the point of
I'll-revert-you-every-thirty-seconds edit warring, they probably won't
be averse to finding an undocumented open proxy, creating sockpuppets,
and continuing on their merry way...