Actually, the new version is out and allows us to start dual licensing.
Discussing is taking place on EN here: [[Wikipedia talk:Transition to
CC-BY-SA]]
A final vote will be on Meta to move all the projects.
--Falcorian
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:11 AM, White Cat
<wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Legal reasons. GFDL isn't compatible with it.
GFDLs new version is said to
be compatible but the release of that has been delayed many times so far.
- White Cat
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:09 AM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 1/8/2009 1:08:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
dgerard(a)gmail.com writes:
I think these are all subclasses of the problem "the GFDL is horriby
vague and broken rubbish that even the FSF has given up on answering
questions about" and we can't move to CC by-sa fast enough.>>
--------------------------
What is holding up the move?
**************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making
headlines. (
http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l